City of Glendale, Arizona logo
FY 2026–27 Budget · Section One

Introduction

An orientation to the City of Glendale — its elected leadership, organization, guiding strategy, and the process behind building a balanced annual budget for FY 2026–27.

260,572
Estimated Population (2025)
66.45 mi²
Net Annexed Area
2,109.25
Authorized FTE (FY27)
Elected Leadership

Glendale City Officials

The Glendale City Council is made up of six Councilmembers elected from separate districts and the Mayor who is elected from the city at large.

Jerry Weiers
Jerry Weiers
Mayor
Citywide
Ray Malnar
Ray Malnar
Vice Mayor / Councilmember
Sahuaro District
Leandro Baldenegro
Leandro Baldenegro
Councilmember
Ocotillo District
Lupe Conchas
Lupe Conchas
Councilmember
Cactus District
Dianna Guzman
Dianna Guzman
Councilmember
Yucca District
Lauren Tolmachoff
Lauren Tolmachoff
Councilmember
Cholla District
Bart Turner
Bart Turner
Councilmember
Barrel District
Glendale Council District Boundaries
Cholla
Sahuaro
Barrel
Ocotillo
Cactus
Yucca

Council District Boundaries — six geographic districts plus an at-large Mayor. Boundaries are reviewed periodically to balance population across districts.

Geography

Map of Glendale & Neighboring Communities

Glendale sits in the West Valley of metropolitan Phoenix, bordered by Peoria, Phoenix, Avondale, Tolleson, El Mirage, and Luke Air Force Base.

Map of Glendale and neighboring communities

Shows the City of Glendale municipal boundary alongside the 2025 Municipal Planning Area and neighboring West Valley communities.

About Glendale

Community Profile

A closer look at the city's history, government, services, and quality of life — the community this budget serves.

History

Historic Sahuaro Ranch

In 1880, the land that is now Glendale was nothing more than an empty desert. But in 1882, William J. Murphy joined three Arizona builders — M.W. Kales, William A. Hancock, and Clark Churchill — to lead the Arizona Canal Co. project, which would bring water to the desert land by 1885. In 1888, Murphy helped construct the diagonal Grand Avenue, and on February 27, 1892, the first residential area of the city began to take shape. The Glendale Grammar School, the city's first school, was built in 1895 and drew people from all over the Valley. In the mid-1890s, Glendale became the pathway for a line of the Santa Fe Railroad, linking the Valley to Prescott and northern Arizona.

More families settled in Glendale after the turn of the century, and the city grew to become one of the most culturally diverse in the Valley — owing much of its heritage to early Hispanic settlers as well as Japanese and Russian families who moved from California. Glendale's Beet Sugar Factory, whose structure still stands southeast of downtown, was instrumental in the city's early economic success, alongside farms and orchards like the 640-acre Sahuaro Ranch. World War I brought cotton prices to $2 a pound and a high demand for food; the resulting need for housing gave rise to today's Catlin Court (built 1915–1930), most of which still stands and is listed on the National Register of Historic Places.

World War II brought the birth of Thunderbird Field to train civilian pilots, and in 1941 the Army began work on Luke Field (now Luke Air Force Base) 10 miles west of Glendale, named for Lt. Frank Luke Jr., the first pilot to receive the Medal of Honor. The military and college presence sparked a need for utilities, parks, schools, and streets — over the following decades the city added an operations center, landfill, water treatment plant, sewage plants, libraries, parks, public safety facilities, an airport, a city hall, and a civic center.

Government & City Services

Glendale City Hall

The City of Glendale operates under a Council-Manager form of government, with a mayor elected at large and six council members elected based on a system of geographic districts. Council members serve staggered four-year terms and the Mayor is elected for a four-year term. The City Manager is appointed by the Mayor and Council.

Police

Objectives include crime prevention, crime control, community involvement, and fair and equitable treatment for residents. Three police stations, 458 sworn officers, and 166 civilian employees.

Fire

Provides fire suppression, emergency medical, hazardous materials, and specialized rescue response. 269 sworn members and 35 civilian employees across nine fire stations, responding to approximately 42,000 calls a year.

Water Services

Provides safe, reliable water, wastewater, and stormwater service to 66,000 customers via four water and two wastewater treatment plants, 1,006 miles of water mains, 728 miles of sewer lines, and 175 miles of stormwater lines — 24/7, year-round.

Solid Waste

Weekly residential garbage and recycling, monthly bulk trash, two annual household hazardous waste events, monthly street sweeping, and front-load/roll-off service for businesses. The city also operates the municipal landfill.

Transportation

Glendale Urban Shuttle (GUS)

Glendale is a member of the Maricopa Association of Governments, the regional council of governments and Metropolitan Planning Organization. Major corridors connecting Glendale to the region include historic Grand Avenue (US 60), Loop 303, Loop 101, and the under-construction Northern Parkway.

As a member of the Regional Public Transportation Authority, Glendale Transit offers fixed-route bus service, Dial-A-Ride, ADA paratransit, and a taxi-subsidy program for residents making repetitive medical trips. The Glendale Urban Shuttle (GUS) offers three free routes with real-time tracking via the "Gus the Bus" app. The City also operates Glendale Regional Airport — a 477-acre general aviation and corporate jet facility five miles west of downtown Glendale and five miles east of Luke Air Force Base.

Quality of Life

Westgate Entertainment District

Glendale offers residents, businesses, and visitors wonderful amenities and an exceptional quality of life: housing ranging from historic properties to master-planned communities to affordable living; Desert Diamond Arena, host to national and international concerts and shows; State Farm Stadium, home of the Arizona Cardinals and host to two Super Bowls, the 2016 College Football Playoff Championship, and two NCAA Men's Final Fours; and Camelback Ranch-Glendale, spring training home of the Los Angeles Dodgers and Chicago White Sox.

Shopping options include Arrowhead Towne Center, Bass Pro Shop, Tanger Outlets, Westgate Entertainment District, and unique downtown boutiques, alongside award-winning special events, cultural and performing arts, and concert venues. VAI Resort — set to become the largest hotel and entertainment destination in Arizona — will add 1,100+ rooms, the country's first Mattel Adventure Park, a 360-degree rotating concert stage, 12 fine dining restaurants, and over 3,000 jobs once complete.

The city maintains four libraries, more than 70 parks totaling over 2,200 acres, two aquatics centers, six community centers, a racquet center, four sports complexes, 46+ miles of hiking and equestrian trails, and more than 500 programs and classes offered yearly — all just 15 to 25 minutes from downtown Phoenix, Sky Harbor International Airport, and over 180 area golf courses.

Tourism

State Farm Stadium

Tourism continues to be an integral part of Glendale's economy. The Convention & Visitors Bureau (CVB) recently relocated from downtown Glendale to the Westgate Sports and Entertainment District, placing visitor services close to State Farm Stadium, Desert Diamond Arena, and the core of Glendale hotels. The CVB promotes Glendale nationally and internationally — the Midwest remains its core domestic market, with New York recently identified as an emerging one, and Canada, Mexico, the UK, and France as ongoing international targets.

An advisory committee including business professionals from Glendale hotels, Westgate, Arrowhead Towne Center, State Farm Stadium, VAI Resort, and Desert Diamond Arena helps guide the CVB's mission to grow convention business. The CVB also operates an official designated State of Arizona Visitor Center, serving as a hub for visitor information for the entire state.

Top Ten Employers

#EmployerEmployees
1Luke Air Force Base9,110
2Banner Health2,510
3Walmart1,660
4Glendale Community College1,540
5Peoria Unified School District1,380
6Deer Valley Unified School District1,160
7Glendale Elementary School District1,150
8Midwestern University1,020
9Abrazo Healthcare940
10Amazon870

Glendale at a Glance

Glendale is located about nine miles northwest of Phoenix, at an elevation of 1,152 feet, with an average annual temperature of 72 degrees and 294 average days of sunshine. The area receives an annual rainfall of 8.4 inches.

Median Age
36 years
Median Household Income
$75,530
Median Home Value
$408,515
Zillow, June 2026
Number of Businesses
6,000+
High School Diploma or Higher
84.5%
Persons Per Household
2.8
Non-English Language at Home
35.3%
Land Area
67 mi²

Primary Education

Glendale is served by twelve elementary, secondary, and unified school districts — most public schools fall under the Glendale Elementary, Glendale Union High School, Deer Valley Unified, and Peoria Unified districts. More than 40,000 school-aged children (5–17) live in Glendale, 15.4% of the population.

Higher Education

Arizona State University West Valley Campus, Glendale Community College (the area's largest community college), Midwestern University, and Arizona Christian University.

Sources: U.S. Census (census.gov/quickfacts) and Zillow, June 2026.

Governance & Structure

Organizational Chart

Updated May 18, 2026. Glendale's government is led by the City Council, with day-to-day operations directed by the City Manager through two Assistant City Managers and department directors across 20+ departments.

City of Glendale — Organizational Chart

Citizens of Glendale
Council & City Manager's Office Assistant City Manager — Mehta Assistant City Manager — Rios Assistant City Manager — St. John Deputy City Manager — Adkins
    We improve the lives of the people we serve every day.  —  COMMUNITY · INTEGRITY · EXCELLENCE · INNOVATION · LEARNING
    Hierarchy sourced from the Citizens of Glendale reporting-line document.

    Interactive chart — click any box with a ▶ arrow to expand or collapse that branch, search by name, title, or department, or use the zoom and print controls in the chart's own toolbar.

    Guiding Philosophy

    Mission. Vision. Values.

    Adopted by City Council in 2017 as the foundation of Glendale's Balanced Scorecard strategic planning process.

    Mission

    We improve the lives of the people we serve every day.

    Vision

    We are the community of choice for residents, businesses, and employees.

    Values
    C
    Community
    We are driven to improve the community experience.
    I
    Integrity
    We provide open and honest governance.
    E
    Excellence
    We make excellence a habit, not a goal.
    I
    Innovation
    We deliver better service through creativity and ingenuity.
    L
    Learning
    We view learning as essential to improvement.
    Strategic Planning

    The Balanced Scorecard

    To better serve our community and its residents, the City of Glendale works to improve the way we do business by strategically aligning the city's resources and activities through a comprehensive citywide strategic plan.

    Our strategic planning efforts are focused on cultivating strategic thinking throughout the entire organization, using a framework referred to as the Balanced Scorecard approach — a tool used by many top-performing corporations in the world and hailed by Harvard Business Review as one of the most influential business ideas of the past 75 years. Balanced Scorecard is a holistic management system that allows organizations to communicate to the public what they intend to accomplish, establishes organizational priorities, aligns the work of the organization with those priorities, and creates a way to measure and report on the progress.

    The Balanced Scorecard approach engages the entire organization starting with the City Council, then executive leadership, and finally cascading down to the foundational level. This ensures every employee interaction with citizens and businesses is driven by a shared vision and desire to accomplish the goals set forth by the City Council.

    In 2017, the City Council provided the leadership necessary to implement the Balanced Scorecard process by developing the city's mission, vision, and values, which clearly articulate why Glendale exists as an organization, what we want our future to be, and the behaviors we expect to see exemplified through our values of integrity, excellence, innovation, community-driven, and learning experiences. Combined with the mission, vision, and values is a four-perspective strategy map that details the main objectives the City focuses on to accomplish its mission — each perspective relating to a different aspect of strategic planning across two categories:

    Resource Perspectives

    Our Organization — employee skills and tools.
    Our Processes — efficiencies, policies, and programs.

    Outcome Perspectives

    Our Finances — financial performance and resource allocation.
    Our Community — satisfaction, needs, and experience.

    01

    Identify

    Identify strategic objectives and Key Performance Indicators, or update the existing plan.

    02

    Plan

    Plan targets for KPIs and prioritize initiatives that will make progress toward the objectives.

    03

    Execute

    Collect data for KPIs as initiatives are executed across departments.

    04

    Review

    Review the outcome of initiatives and KPIs, identifying areas for improvement and successes.

    This strategic plan is managed and maintained by cross-departmental teams that follow the basic tenets of this continuous improvement cycle. Each objective is championed by an executive team member and a team of experts, who monitor progress using Key Performance Indicators and their targets and lead initiatives that create progress in these areas. The teams meet quarterly to evaluate progress, gather data, and work on initiatives; the strategic plan itself is reviewed annually and adjusted as needed from lessons learned in the prior year.

    This same pattern of strategic planning is carried out at the department level — each department has developed a strategic plan that connects to the citywide plan, with the same steps and continual monitoring. In the next phase, divisions within departments will begin work on division-level scorecards using this same process, intent, and follow-up.

    Strategic Planning

    The Nine Steps to Success™ Framework

    Glendale's Balanced Scorecard program follows the Balanced Scorecard Institute's Nine Steps to Success™ methodology, a proven framework for building and sustaining a citywide strategic management system.

    Balanced Scorecard - The Nine Steps to Success framework diagram
    Working for You

    Strategic Initiatives

    Ten citywide strategic initiatives translate the four Balanced Scorecard perspectives into concrete priorities for FY26-27 and beyond.

    Our Community

    Improve Community Experience

    Our Finances

    Improve Asset Management
    Improve Resource Alignment

    Our Processes

    Increase Innovation Solutions
    Optimize Processes & Services
    Improve Stakeholder Engagement
    Improve Purposeful Communication

    Our Organization

    Improve Tools & Technology
    Strengthen Workforce Culture
    Strengthen Workforce Development

    Results That Matter. The future is a new frontier that we embrace with excitement and enthusiasm. Advancing organizational performance in service to our community is what we do. We are Team Glendale!

    Reader's Guide

    How to Make the Most of This Document

    This budget book serves two purposes: presenting City Council and the public with a clear picture of city services and policy alternatives, and providing city management with a financial and operating plan that adheres to Glendale's financial policies.

    The Appendix rounds out the document with key city statistics — population, income, school enrollment, parks, libraries, and public safety facilities — along with a frequently-asked-questions section and a plain-language glossary of budget terms.

    Timeline

    FY 2026–27 Budget Calendar

    Building Glendale's annual budget is a year-long effort spanning revenue analysis, department input, Council workshops, and public hearings.

    Jul 2025 – Jan 2026
    Budget staff analyzed revenue and expenditure data to assess the FY26-27 budget and economic outlook, working with the City Manager's Office on balancing options for revenue, operating, and debt service budgets. Premium and indirect-cost items were prepared alongside a revenue trend analysis.
    Oct 2025 – Mar 2026
    The Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) process ran in parallel: department input, project and O&M budget review by engineering, budget & finance, and facilities staff, prioritization against Council's strategic priorities, financing options, and preparation of the Preliminary FY2027-2036 CIP.
    December 2025
    Operating Budget Kickoff held December 2, 2025. Department base budgets and supplemental requests were due December 31, 2025, followed by budget office review meetings in January.
    January 27, 2026
    The Five-Year Financial Forecast for the General Fund and major operating funds was presented to Council at a workshop, along with the FY26-27 budget calendar and process, and key revenue and forecast items for consideration. View Presentation
    March 3, 2026
    Council workshop on prioritizing the FY2027-36 Capital Improvement Plan, covering Airport, Arts, Drainage, Facility Maintenance, Landfill, Library, Parking Lots, Parks, Public Safety, Solid Waste, Streets, Transit, Wastewater, and Water programs. View Presentation
    March 30, 2026
    City Council reviewed draft department budgets for FY26-27 at a budget workshop. View Presentation
    April 28, 2026
    Final budget workshop: Council reviewed the tentative budget covering revenues, expenditures, contingency funds, debt service, and the 10-year Capital Improvement Plan. View Presentation
    May 12, 2026
    Council adopted a resolution approving the FY26-27 tentative budget, directed its publication, set June 9, 2026 for the final budget public hearing, and held a public hearing on the FY26-27 property tax levy. View Agenda Item
    June 9 & 23, 2026
    Council held a public hearing and adopted the FY26-27 final budget on June 9 view agenda item; the FY26-27 Property Tax Levy was adopted on June 23. view agenda item
    July 1, 2026
    Start of fiscal year 2026-2027.
    Methodology

    Budget Process

    The goal of the FY26-27 budget is to align resources with City Council's strategic objectives from the Balanced Scorecard, discussed in detail in the City Manager's Budget Message.

    1

    Analyze & Prepare

    Analyze revenue collections, develop the tentative operating budget, and prepare capital budget requests.

    2

    Compile & Analyze

    Budget staff compilation and analysis of department submissions.

    3

    Executive Review

    City Manager and Executive Leadership Team review.

    4

    Council Workshops

    Council budget workshop sessions held January through April.

    5

    Tentative Adoption

    Adoption of the tentative budget, setting the expenditure limitation.

    6

    Set Hearing Dates

    Setting the date for budget adoption and property tax levy public hearings.

    7

    Final Adoption

    Public hearing and adoption of the final budget.

    8

    Levy Adoption

    Public hearing on the property tax levy and adoption of the levy.

    Over the course of several months, balancing options and fiscal strategies for both the operating budget and the CIP were evaluated across a series of budget workshops. All agendas, minutes, videos, and budget documents are available at www.glendaleaz.gov.

    Glendale by the Numbers

    City Statistics

    A snapshot of Glendale's growth, staffing, and service levels across public safety, parks, utilities, and transportation.

    Population (2025 Est.)
    260,572
    Up from 248,325 in the 2020 Census
    Net Annexed Area
    66.45 mi²
    Grown from 1 sq. mi. in 1910
    Authorized Staffing FY27
    2,109.25
    Full-time & part-time (permanent) FTE
    Total Park Acreage
    2,227.9
    77 parks across the city

    Population Growth, 1970 – 2025

    Building Permits Issued, FY2017 – FY2026

    Recent Election Turnout

    Annexed Area by Era (Cumulative Sq. Miles)

    PeriodCumulative Sq. Miles
    19101
    1910–196915
    1970–197939
    1980–198950
    1990–199955
    2000–201059
    2011–202065
    2021–202666.45 (net)

    Fire Protection (CY 2025)

    Number of Stations9
    EMS Incidents36,293
    Fire Incidents3,558
    Miscellaneous Incidents3,041
    Total Calls (incl. Automatic Aid)42,892
    Fire FTE's (FY 2026)304

    Police Protection (CY 2025)

    Number of Stations3
    Calls Processed*325,446
    Text to 911626
    Vehicular Patrol Units**199
    Number of Reserves (FY2025)14
    Police FTE's (FY2025)***624

    *Incoming, outgoing and 911 calls. **Marked lights/sirens & uniformed officers. ***Authorized FTE's, sworn and civilian.

    Court Offenses Processed (July 1, 2025 – June 12, 2026)

    Case TypeFilings
    DUI1,406
    Other Criminal Traffic1,294
    Civil Traffic17,146
    Local Non-Criminal Ordinances2,870
    Non-Traffic Misdemeanor8,793
    Protective Orders1,584
    Total Case Filings33,093

    Parks & Recreation Facilities (FY 2026)

    Conservation Park1Diamond Fields54
    Regional Parks7Swimming Pools2
    Neighborhood Parks56Splash Pads5
    Community Parks9Dog Parks4
    Sports Complexes4Skate Parks2
    Total Park Acreage2,227.9Reservable Ramadas48
    Playgrounds98Area Lights1,615
    Ramadas (Total)230Park Benches626
    Tennis Courts36Drinking Fountains144
    Racquetball Courts44Barbeques236
    Basketball Courts62Picnic Tables709
    Volleyball Courts43Outdoor Pickleball Courts18
    Multipurpose Fields62Miles of Trails / Walkways46 / 25
    Disc Golf · Amphitheater3 · 1Sensory Garden · Bird Blind1 · 1

    Water Services (FY 2026+)

    Number of Customers65,440
    Miles of Distribution Lines1,006
    Storage Capacity67 MG
    Total Treatment Capacity121.1 MGD
    Annual Consumption13.0 BG
    Avg. Daily Water Treated35.6 MGD
    Avg. Consumption / Customer199 KG

    Wastewater Services (FY 2026+)

    Number of Customers60,900
    Miles of Collection Lines728
    Total Treatment Capacity29.2 MGD
    Annual Wastewater Treated7.0 BG
    Avg. Daily Water Treated19.2 MGD

    Solid Waste & Landfill (FY 2026+)

    Residential Customers59,838
    Commercial Customers1,039
    Landfill & MRF Customer Transactions168,720
    Residential Tonnage Processed237,296
    Commercial Tonnage Processed206,656
    Recycle Tonnage9,406
    Total Tonnage Processed472,106

    Transit Ridership (FY 2026+)

    Total Glendale Transit Ridership1,572,464
    Fixed Route1,369,974
    Regional ADA Service24,772
    Glendale Urban Shuttle (GUS)72,411
    Dial-a-Ride Total / ADA43,449 / 12,501
    Taxi Program4,357
    Avg. Monthly Aircraft Based at Airport420

    Streets & Traffic Infrastructure

    Streetlights22,095
    Pedestrian Lights818
    Signalized Intersections207
    Total Bus Stops (w/ Shelters)548 (196)
    Miles Maintained — Arterial118
    Miles Maintained — Residential548
    Miles Maintained — Collector89
    Miles Maintained — Alleys12

    Sources: various City of Glendale department records; U.S. Census Bureau. Figures marked "+" are estimates.

    Recognition

    GFOA Distinguished Budget Presentation Award

    The Government Finance Officers Association's highest form of recognition in governmental budgeting.

    GFOA Distinguished Budget Presentation Award

    Presented to the City of Glendale, Arizona

    For the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2025, the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) presented its Distinguished Budget Presentation Award to the City of Glendale.

    To receive this award, a governmental unit must publish a budget document that meets program criteria as a policy document, financial plan, operations guide, and communications device — recognizing the document that resulted in this award for the current budget continues to conform to program requirements.

    Signed by Christopher P. Morrill, Executive Director, Government Finance Officers Association.

    City of Glendale, Arizona — FY 2026–27 Budget Summary · Introduction
    FY 2026–27 Budget · Section Two

    City Manager's Budget Message

    Presented to the Mayor and City Council on June 9, 2026 — a look at how the FY26-27 budget balances strategic investment with disciplined restraint.

    $1.41B
    Total FY26-27 Budget
    $1.3883
    Property Tax Rate — 11th Straight Year of Decline
    $714M
    Operating Budget (+1% YoY)
    $441M
    FY26-27 Capital Improvement Plan
    Budget Message

    To the Citizens of Glendale, the Mayor, and Members of the City Council

    June 9, 2026
    I am honored to present the City of Glendale's FY2026-27 Annual Budget and Ten-Year Capital Improvement Plan.
    Patrick S. Banger, City Manager

    The FY26-27 budget totals $1.41 billion and reflects the City's continued commitment to responsible fiscal stewardship while advancing the services, infrastructure, and workforce essential to a growing and dynamic community. Although the budget remains flat compared to the prior year, its priorities demonstrate strategic reinvestment and forward-looking decision-making aligned with City Council goals — particularly in public safety, parks, infrastructure modernization, innovation, and long-term resilience.

    For the 11th consecutive year, Glendale's total property tax rate is projected to decline, from $1.4538 to $1.3883.

    This sustained reduction underscores the City's ability to deliver high-quality services while remaining attentive to affordability and the financial well-being of our residents.

    The City Council's commitment to strengthening Glendale's neighborhoods, transportation network, and public safety systems is evident in this year's staffing and capital decisions. New full-time positions have been added across multiple departments to enhance service delivery and support a modern, responsive government. These include court security officers and police officers to meet rising public safety demands; transit and parks service workers to support increased facility usage; and additional positions in Innovation & Technology and Human Resources to improve internal operations and accelerate organizational efficiency.

    The FY26-27 budget also funds targeted supplemental requests across departments. The Organizational Performance Department will conduct a new business survey to gather actionable community feedback, while the Transportation Department receives additional resources to support new infrastructure projects scheduled throughout the City.

    Investments that enhance quality of life remain a core priority. Glendale's Residential Landscape Improvement Program continues to help low-income households transition to attractive, low-maintenance, drought-resistant landscapes. Public safety enhancements include new medical equipment and restocking capabilities at fire stations, as well as expanded cancer screening for Fire personnel — initiatives that strengthen Glendale's capacity to remain a safe, resilient community as it grows.

    Overall, the FY26-27 budget demonstrates that Glendale can balance strategic investment with disciplined restraint — delivering high-quality services, protecting critical infrastructure, and responding to resident needs while continuing to reduce the overall tax burden. The City remains focused on long-range planning, sound financial management, and advancing the priorities established by the Mayor and Council.

    Methodology

    Budget Approach

    The FY26-27 financial forecast and recommended operating and capital budgets were developed in alignment with the City's adopted financial policies. These policies emphasize fiscal conservatism, flexibility, and adherence to the highest standards of public finance and organizational management.

    By the Numbers

    Operating Budget Highlights

    The total FY26-27 Operating Budget is $714 million, a 1% increase over the FY25-26 budget of $710 million.

    • Inflationary adjustments for contractual obligations, utilities, fuel, supplies, and technology system maintenance
    • Salary increases consistent with current Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs) for represented employees
    • A continued focus on employee retention, including a 3.0% COLA and performance pay of up to 2.0% for non-MOU employees
    • Strategic additions of full-time positions to support operational needs, including new court security officers, police officers, Parks and Recreation staff, Water Services positions for infrastructure expansion, and HR and IT staff to enhance internal efficiency
    • Targeted public safety investments, including cancer screenings, a new welfare-check reassurance program, and funding for vehicle replacements
    • Water Services software enhancements to support long-term resource reliability

    FY25-26 vs. FY26-27 Operating Budget

    Workforce Investment

    New Positions (FTE)

    A net total of 29.75 new full-time equivalent (FTE) positions are included in the FY26-27 Operating Budget, spread across four fund types.

    General Fund — 20.5 FTE

    City Court4.5
    Field Operations1
    Parks and Recreation6
    Police Services9
    Total General Fund20.5

    Enterprise Fund — 3 FTE

    Water Services3
    Total Enterprise Fund3

    Internal Service Fund — 4 FTE

    Human Resources2
    Innovation and Technology2
    Total Internal Service Fund4

    Special Revenue Fund — 2.25 FTE

    Police Services1
    Transportation1.25
    Total Special Revenue Fund2.25

    New FTE by Fund Type

    Largest Operating Fund

    General Fund

    The FY26-27 General Fund operating budget totals $355.1 million, with public safety remaining the City's largest and most essential investment.

    Police & Fire
    $220.6M
    65% of General Fund expenditures
    Parks & Recreation
    $24.0M
    Second-largest General Fund category
    All Other General Fund
    $110.5M
    Remaining departments & services
    Contingency
    $5.0M
    For unforeseen expenditures or revenue shifts

    General Fund Operating Budget — $355.1M

    Sources & Uses

    General Fund Forecast

    The FY26-27 General Fund budget is balanced through the planned use of excess unassigned fund balance, ensuring continued stability while supporting priority investments.

    Funding Sources

    Beginning Fund Balance$250,908,249
    Operating Revenue$363,021,738
    Transfers In (Public Safety Sales Tax)$48,728,895
    Total Sources$662,658,882

    Funding Uses

    Operating Expenditures($341,778,633)
    Transfers Out($83,142,506)
    Contingency($5,000,000)
    Total Uses($429,921,139)
    ENDING FUND BALANCE
    $232,737,743
    See the full Five-Year Forecast in Financial Guidelines
    Long-Term Planning

    Capital Improvement Plan

    Glendale's long-term capital planning continues to strengthen economic development, public safety, and quality of life. The FY2027-2036 Capital Improvement Plan totals $2.83 billion and is updated annually to reflect evolving needs and opportunities. Only the first year of the plan is appropriated at budget adoption.

    FY26-27 CIP (Year One)
    $441M
    Appropriated at budget adoption
    FY2027-2036 CIP (10-Year)
    $2.83B
    Updated annually
    Plan Horizon
    10 Years
    FY2027 through FY2036
    Review Cycle
    Annual
    Reflects evolving needs & opportunities

    Notable FY26-27 First-Year Projects

    W91st Avenue Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements
    WArrowhead Ranch Water Reclamation Facility Upgrades
    FFire Station #154
    PPolice Crime Lab
    PPublic Safety Building Renovation
    SPavement management, street reconstruction, and intersection safety improvements
    RPark upgrades and new recreational infrastructure
    SSewer Line Rehabilitation Program
    Explore all 325 projects in the Capital Improvement Plan
    In Closing

    Conclusion

    The FY2026-27 operating and capital budgets reflect the City Council's financial policies, long-term planning framework, and commitment to responsible governance. Through conservative forecasting and strategic prioritization, Glendale continues to maintain a strong financial foundation while investing in the infrastructure, public safety systems, and quality-of-life enhancements that support a thriving community.

    Glendale remains a trusted partner to the business community, a champion for neighborhood livability, and an organization committed to continuous improvement in service delivery and workforce development. These collective efforts advance our vision of being the community of choice for residents, businesses, and employees.

    I extend my sincere appreciation to the Mayor and Council, as well as the dedicated City staff across all departments, for their professionalism, collaboration, and commitment throughout the development of the FY26-27 budget.

    Signature of Patrick S. Banger
    Patrick S. Banger
    City Manager
    City of Glendale, Arizona — FY 2026–27 Budget Summary · City Manager's Budget Message
    FY 2026–27 Budget · Section Three

    Financial Guidelines

    The Five-Year Financial Forecast and the City's Financial Policies together guide Glendale's budgeting beyond the immediate year, ensuring financial stability and adequate resources to sustain services and quality of life.

    5 Years
    Forecast Horizon — FY26-27 to FY30-31
    8 Funds
    General, Special Revenue & Enterprise
    2.76%
    Average Annual Inflation, 1990–2026
    $354.6M
    FY26-27 General Fund Operating Revenue
    Foundation Documents

    Overview

    Glendale's annual and long-range budgeting process is guided by two key foundation documents contained within the Annual Budget: the Five-Year Financial Forecast and Financial Policies.

    Best practice recommends financial forecasts be updated each year to adjust for changes in national and local economic conditions and trends, changes in Council priorities and policies, and other variables that might affect the City's ability to provide needed services and maintain its financial integrity in future years. The forecast identifies the direction in which the City is headed based on information known at the time it is updated for the annual budget document.

    The Five-Year Financial Forecast is prepared for each of the City's major operating funds at the beginning of the annual budget process, covering the General Fund, Special Revenue Funds (Highway User Revenue Fund, Transportation Sales Tax, Police Sales Tax, and Fire Sales Tax), and Enterprise Funds (Solid Waste, Landfill, and Water & Wastewater). The context of this year's forecast is centered on balancing General Fund sources and uses while maintaining adequate fund balances — improving service levels where necessary while increasing or preserving the level of fund reserves.

    Balanced Budget Requirement

    Arizona State law and City financial policies require that each annual City budget be balanced — total financial resources available cannot exceed the budgeted period's expenditures. The adopted FY26-27 budget complies with this requirement in all City funds. Projected operating reserves and contingency appropriations can be adjusted during the budget process based on each fund's financial situation.

    Value of Forecasting

    Forecasting estimates future revenue and expenditure levels, the resources required to meet current service levels, and how the total financial program will be affected by economic factors — providing insight into the tax, revenue, and service options the City Council must address.

    How the Forecast Is Built

    Long-Range Forecasting Models

    The forecasting methodology reflects a combination of internal analysis and external economic research, tailored to Glendale's unique conditions.

    Revenue Forecasting Inputs

    • Development activity, retail sales, and state and local economic trends
    • Prior-year revenue patterns and anticipated trends
    • State Finance Advisory Committee (FAC) projections
    • Economic & Business Research Program, University of Arizona
    • JP Morgan Chase Economy Outlook Center
    • L. William Seidman Research Institute, Arizona State University

    Statewide external forecasts are adjusted where necessary to reflect conditions unique to Glendale.

    Expenditure Growth Factors

    • Growth in the components of personnel costs
    • Inflation in non-personnel costs — general inflation, fuel, and utilities
    • City financial policies related to new or expanded programs
    • New operational and debt service funding tied to Capital Improvement Program projects

    Glendale's forecasting models also enable "what-if" scenario testing to estimate short- and long-term financial consequences.

    Council-Adopted Policy

    Financial Policies

    A key component of the FY26-27 budget is the adoption of the Council's financial policies, which serve as the foundation for establishing a strong, sustainable financial plan. The policies provide broad guidance across five key areas, discussed below. A department is defined as a separate departmental unit presented in the City's most recent organizational chart; a fund is a balanced set of accounts appearing as a column in the "Basic Financial Statements" or "Combining Financial Statements" section of the City's Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR).

    Fiscal planning is the process of identifying resources and allocating them among numerous and complex competing purposes. The primary vehicle for this planning is the preparation, monitoring, and analysis of the budget — incorporating a long-term perspective and monitoring the performance of the programs competing to receive funding.

    The City Manager will submit to the Council a proposed annual budget, based on Council's established goals, and will execute the budget as finally adopted, pursuant to Title 42, Chapter 17, Article 3, Section 17105 of the Arizona Revised Statutes, as amended.

    1. Revenue and expenditure forecasts will be prepared annually and will include a Five-Year Forecast for each major operating fund (General Fund, Enterprise Funds, and certain Special Revenue Funds), prepared at the start of the operating budget process to (1) provide a long-term view of current-year budget decisions and (2) estimate fund balance and its sensitivity to revenue and expenditure changes over the forecast period.
      • The budget will be balanced, by fund, when all projected ongoing revenue sources exceed all ongoing expenses proposed for the current and upcoming fiscal year. Use of the unassigned fund balance will occur only as authorized by Council and to address one-time costs, not ongoing costs or planned utilization of fund balance.
      • Revenues will not be dedicated for specific purposes unless approved by Council or required by law. All non-restricted revenues will be deposited in the General Fund and appropriated through the annual budget process.
    2. To ensure ongoing General Fund stability, the primary property tax levy will be evaluated each year to determine where it should be set.
    3. Any proposed new service or program initiative will be developed to reflect current Council policy directives and considered in the context of balancing ongoing anticipated revenues against ongoing anticipated expenses, following all related Council Financial Policies.
    4. All grant programs and any programs supplemented by outside funding will include a sunset provision consistent with the projected end of funding. Personnel paid with these funds will be considered temporary with no certainty of continued employment beyond the life of the funding unless otherwise approved by Council. Equipment and technology purchases with these funds are subject to the policies for replacement funds.
    5. The City Manager's recommended budget presented to Council will contain, at a minimum:
      • Revenue projections by major category, by fund;
      • Expenditure projections by program level and major expenditure category, by fund, including support provided to or received from other funds;
      • Debt service principal and interest amounts;
      • Proposed inter-fund transfers;
      • Projected fund balance by fund;
      • Proposed personnel staffing levels;
      • Detailed schedule of capital projects;
      • Any additional information, data, or analysis requested by Council.
    6. The operating budget will be based on the principle that current ongoing operating expenditures, including debt service and support for other funds, will be funded with current ongoing revenues. The enterprise funds (water/sewer, solid waste, and landfill) and the transportation sales tax fund will pay the indirect cost charges for services provided by other funds. Additional funds may be added upon Council approval.
    7. The budget will not use one-time (non-recurring) sources to fund continuing (recurring) expenditures.
    8. Addition of personnel will be requested only to meet existing program initiatives and policy directives after service needs have been thoroughly examined, and only if increased net ongoing revenue is substantiated.
    9. The Budget and Finance Department and Human Resources Department will work together to manage position control. The number of full-time and regular part-time employees on the payroll will not exceed the total number of full-time equivalent positions that Council authorizes and adopts with the annual budget.
    10. Benefits and compensation will be administered in accordance with Council policy direction.
      • Total compensation will be evaluated periodically for competitiveness.
      • A cost containment strategy means total costs for health insurance premiums will be shared between the employer, employees, and retirees. Total premiums will be evaluated annually to ensure they are reasonable, competitive, and expected to address anticipated claims plus maintenance of an adequate reserve for the Employee Benefits Fund, based on an annual actuarial report and its 75% confidence funding level recommendation.
      • A policy will be developed regarding continuation of retiree health insurance after a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of GASB 67 and presentation of results to Council.
    11. Ideas for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the city's programs and the productivity of its employees will be considered during the budget process.
    12. Carryover of unspent appropriation from one fiscal year to the next is not automatic. Budget and Finance Department staff will evaluate carryover requests and make recommendations to the City Manager; recommended requests will be included in the City Manager's budget presented to Council.
    13. Salary savings will be retained to the greatest extent possible to build fund balance. Salary savings may be used for expenses upon the City Manager or designee's approval if within the same fund/department, or between funds/departments upon Council approval within the last three months of the fiscal year.
    14. Total fund appropriation changes must be approved by Council. These changes must also comply with the city's Alternative Expenditure Limitation in accordance with Article IX, Section 20, Constitution of Arizona and A.R.S. § 41-563, where final budget adoption sets the maximum allowable appropriation for the upcoming fiscal year.
    15. The replacement of General Fund capital equipment and related support for technology, vehicles, and telephonic equipment (except cell phones) will be accomplished through a "rental rate structure" revised annually as part of the annual budget process.
      • Any equipment purchased with grant funding will be considered for ongoing replacement and replacement premium funding only if specifically authorized by the City Manager and noted in the budget submittal.
      • Ongoing replacement costs for new technology and vehicle purchases will be incorporated into the upcoming fiscal year's rental rate structure regardless of whether initially purchased through a lease or pay-as-you-go funding.
      • Replacements will be based on equipment lifecycle analyses by the Public Works Department for City vehicles, or the Budget and Finance Department for technology and telephonic systems.
    16. The City Council supports economic development objectives that support the creation and retention of quality jobs (25% greater than the median average wage in Maricopa County), add revenue, and enhance the quality of life in Glendale. City Council will consider incentives when circumstances of the economic development opportunity warrant them necessary and appropriate, and in the best interest of the city.

    Purpose & Restrictions. This policy implements an effective and efficient process by which the adopted City budget may be amended. Throughout the fiscal year, amendments are necessary to address new issues, increased prices, changes in scope of existing projects, and unforeseen issues affecting City operations. It applies to all cash and budget appropriation transfers initiated by the Mayor and City Council, the City Manager's Office, and/or departments; the Budget and Finance Department processes budget amendments in the financial management system following appropriate authorization.

    Article VI, Section 11 of the City Charter establishes the legal restriction for budget appropriation transfers: "The city manager may at any time transfer any unencumbered appropriation balance or portion thereof between general classifications of expenditures within an office, department or agency. At the request of the city manager and within the last three months of the fiscal year, the council may by ordinance transfer any unencumbered appropriation balance or portion thereof from one office, department or agency to another."

    Policy.

    • Cash Transfers — between funds can only be authorized by Council in the last three months of the fiscal year.
    • Cash & Appropriation Transfers Between Funds — can only be authorized by Council in the last three months of the fiscal year.
    • Appropriation Transfers
      • Between Funds — can only be authorized by Council approval in the last three months of the fiscal year.
      • Between Departments — can only be authorized by Council approval in the last three months of the fiscal year.
      • Within the Same Fund, Within the Same Department — can be authorized by City Manager approval throughout the fiscal year.
      • Between Capital Improvement Projects — between departments, only by Council approval in the last three months of the fiscal year; within the same department and fund, by City Manager approval throughout the fiscal year.
    • Restricted Fund Transfers — cash and/or appropriation transfers into and out of restricted funds can only be authorized by Council approval, and only within the intent of the restricted funds. Council must be provided justification that the transfer is consistent with restricted fund purposes, assurance it has been legally reviewed by the City Attorney, and assurance it meets this transfer policy's restrictions.
    • Contingency & Miscellaneous Grant Appropriation Transfers — not specific to any particular department: Contingency transfers can be authorized by Council throughout the fiscal year; Miscellaneous Grant appropriation transfers can be authorized by the City Manager throughout the fiscal year.
    • Approval of Expenditures in Excess of Budget Appropriations — in emergency situations requiring a transfer before formal Council approval is possible, the Budget and Finance Department will advise the City Manager of the emergency condition and request approval, then seek Council ratification at the first possible Council meeting.

    Management will ensure compliance with the City Council adopted budget.

    1. Expenditures will be controlled by an annual appropriated budget. Council will establish appropriations through the budget process and may transfer these appropriations as necessary through the budget amendment process.
    2. The purchasing system will provide commodities and services in a timely manner to avoid interruptions in service delivery. All purchases will be made in accordance with the procurement code, purchasing policies, guidelines and procedures, and applicable state and federal laws. The city may join cooperative purchasing agreements to obtain supplies, equipment, and services at the best value.
    3. A system of internal controls and procedures using best practices will be maintained for the procurement and payment processes.
    4. The State of Arizona sets a limit on the expenditures of local jurisdictions. Compliance with these expenditure limitations is required — the city will submit an audited expenditure limitation report as defined by the Uniform Expenditure Reporting System (A.R.S. § 41-1279.07) along with audited financial statements to the State Auditor General within the required timeframe.

    Long-term debt is used to finance capital projects with long useful lives. Financing capital projects with debt provides for "intergenerational equity," because the actual users of the capital asset pay for its cost over time, rather than one group of users paying in advance for the costs of the asset.

    The city will not give or loan its credit in aid of, nor make any donation, grant, or payment of any public funds, by subsidy or otherwise, to any individual, association, or corporation, except where there is a clearly identified public purpose and the city either receives direct consideration substantially equal to its expenditure or provides direct assistance to those in need. Long-term debt will not be used to fund current operations or smaller projects that can be financed from current revenues or resources.

    1. A 10-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) will be updated annually as part of the budget process and will include projected life cycle costing. Only the first year of the plan will be appropriated; the remainder are projections addressed in subsequent years. Life cycle costing calculates the total cost of a physical asset throughout its life, accounting for all costs from acquisition to disposal, including design, installation, operating, and maintenance costs.
    2. The 10-year CIP will address capital needs in order: (a) improve existing assets; (b) replace existing assets; (c) construct new assets.
    3. All projects will be evaluated annually by a multi-departmental team regarding accuracy of projected costs; consistency with the General Plan and Council policy goals; long-range master plans; ability to finance initial capital costs; ability to finance life cycle costs; and ability to cover associated additional ongoing operating costs.
    4. All projects funded with general obligation bonds will be undertaken only with voter approval through a bond election. General Obligation debt is supported by secondary property tax revenues, assessed based on the ability to finance the City's debt service obligations; the rate depends on revenue requirements and the assessed valuation of taxable property. At minimum, the general obligation debt service fund balance will be at least 10% of the next fiscal year's property tax supported debt service.
    5. Non-voter approved debt supported by General Fund revenues — such as Municipal Property Corporation (MPC) bonds, excise tax bonds, and lease obligations — will be used only when a dedicated ongoing revenue source is identified to pay the associated debt service. This debt service will not exceed 10% of the 5-year average of the General Fund's operating revenue available to support it. For FY26-27, debt service is 15.6% of General Fund operating revenue as defined above.
    6. For non-voter approved debt, the following are considered prior to pledging projected revenues for ongoing debt service: the project requires ongoing revenue not available from other sources; matching monies are available that may be lost if not applied for in a timely manner; or catastrophic conditions exist.
    7. Short-term borrowing or lease/purchase contracts should be considered for financing major operating capital equipment only when the repayment term does not exceed the equipment's expected useful life, an ongoing revenue source is identified to pay the annual debt service, and the Budget and Finance Director, along with the city's financial advisors, determine it is in the city's best financial interest.
    8. These policies are in addition to the policies incorporated in the Debt Management Plan.

    Fund balance is an important indicator of the City's financial position. Adequate fund balances allow the City to continue providing services to the community in case of economic downturns and/or unexpected emergencies or requirements. Use of fund balances is limited to unanticipated, non-recurring needs and planned future one-time or non-recurring obligations; unassigned balances may be used to allow time to restructure operations, but must be approved by City Council.

    1. The minimum fund balance in the General Fund (the unassigned amount) shall total 25% of total budgeted ongoing expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year. Any usage must be approved by a majority of the City Council, should only occur for unexpected revenue shortfalls, unforeseen circumstances, and emergencies, and should be replenished within the subsequent fiscal year if possible (extendable up to five years based on circumstances).
    2. For the Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund: the target for fund balance will be 50% of operating expenses; the Senior Lien Debt Service Coverage Ratio target will be 1.85; the target for Days Cash on Hand will be 250 days.
    3. The minimum fund balance in the Solid Waste Enterprise Fund will be maintained at 10% of operating revenues.
    4. The minimum fund balance in the Landfill Enterprise Fund will be maintained at 15% of operating revenues.
    5. For the other major governmental operating funds, the minimum unassigned fund balance shall be: PSST 5% of operating revenue; HURF 15% of operating revenue; others 10% of operating revenue.
    6. If fund balance at the end of the current fiscal year is less than the Council-approved level, the deficiency should be replenished in coming fiscal years, not to exceed a total of five consecutive years.
    7. The City Manager may establish additional assigned fund balance reserves for certain anticipated obligations or other purposes.
    8. Any balance in excess of the fund balance reserves may be used to support one-time expenditures; Council approval is required to use these funds to supplement "pay as you go" capital outlay, one-time operating expenditures, or to prepay existing debt.
    9. The fund balance for the various Trust Funds will be based on annual actuarial reports, with a target funding level at the 75% confidence funding level.
    10. Separate fund balance operating reserves may be required by bond issuance documents for funds with outstanding bonded debt. These requirements will not be viewed as additional fund balance needs unless greater than those established by these goals.
    Key Assumption

    Inflation Rates

    Inflation has a major impact on all City revenues and expenditures. The forecast model relies on the Western Region Consumer Price Index for Urban Users (CPI-U), adjusted for regional influences.

    1990–2026 Average
    2.76%
    Annual inflation rate since the CPI-U base year
    10-Year Average
    3.53%
    2017–2026
    5-Year Average
    4.03%
    2022–2026, reflecting post-pandemic pressure
    Purchasing Power
    $131.50 → $350
    Cost of the same goods, 1990 vs. 2026

    Western Region CPI-U Index, 1990–2025

    Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (bls.gov). Inflation began increasing significantly in 2021 and has slowly returned to normal through the first half of 2026.

    Key Assumption

    Salaries, Benefits & Retirement Contributions

    Personnel costs are the largest cost component among the major operating funds that provide services to the public.

    Salaries & Wages

    Forecasted salary projections for non-represented employees assumed a cost-of-living adjustment and merit raises based on employee performance, increasing by an annual average of 3% for FY26-27 through FY30-31. Salary and benefit projections for represented police and fire personnel follow current memoranda of understanding, with normal step-plan progression assumed throughout the forecast.

    Employee Benefits

    Benefit costs consist mainly of health insurance and employer-paid payroll taxes and benefits. The forecast assumes moderate increases to health insurance and anticipated increases to Risk Management and Workers' Compensation premiums — with total employee benefit costs, including health insurance, assumed to increase by an average of 3.7% annually over the five-year period.

    Employer Retirement Contribution Rates

    Retirement SystemFY26-27FY27-28*FY28-29*FY29-30*FY30-31*
    Arizona State Retirement System11.98%11.99%12.00%12.02%12.03%
    Public Safety Retirement — Police32.49%32.65%32.82%32.98%33.14%
    Public Safety Retirement — Fire34.50%34.67%34.85%35.02%35.20%
    Elected Officials Retirement System70.44%70.44%70.44%70.44%70.44%

    Rates shown as a percentage of covered earnings. Due to the financial condition of the retirement plans — especially PSPRS — contributions are expected to increase through the forecast period. Ficals Years 27-28 through FY30-31 are estimates.

    Key Assumption

    Debt Service & Capital Replacement Funds

    Debt Service Obligations

    The General Fund forecast assumes $20.5 million in FY27 debt service for the Certificates of Participation (COPs) issued in FY22 to pay down unfunded liability in the Public Safety Personnel Retirement System (PSPRS). Municipal Property Corporation (MPC) debt service — supporting infrastructure at Zanjero, Camelback Ranch, Desert Diamond Arena, and the Westgate convention center/media center/parking garage — totals $34.6 million in FY27. Total General Fund financed debt service averages $55 million annually across the forecast period.

    Vehicle, Equipment & Technology Replacement

    These funds allow the City to replace outdated or worn-out equipment at regular intervals, administered by the Field Operations, Budget and Finance, and Innovation and Technology departments respectively. Ongoing contributions to the Technology Fund are assumed throughout the forecast. The Fleet Replacement Fund's city-wide motor pool requires departments to return low-mileage or low-utilization vehicles for city-wide use on a first-come, first-served basis.

    See payment schedules and bond capacity in Budget Summaries · Debt Service
    Where the Money Comes From

    General Fund Revenue Sources

    Approximately 81% of General Fund revenue comes from City Sales Tax and State-Shared Revenue.

    FY26-27 Operating Revenue Composition — $354.6M

    City Sales Tax — ~49% of Revenue

    Highly elastic and tied directly to economic conditions. FY26-27 assumes a growth rate of (1%), with FY26-27 through FY30-31 averaging a conservative 1% — reflecting continued local economic strength offset by the eventual recovery from the elimination of residential rental tax.

    State-Shared Revenue — 30.3% of Revenue

    Distributed state sales, income, and vehicle license taxes total $107.6 million in FY26-27, forecasted to grow at an average of 3% annually. Includes an anticipated AZSTA reimbursement for Camelback Ranch Spring Training Facility, averaging $10.1 million per year through FY30-31.

    Property Tax & Other Revenue

    Primary property tax is roughly 2% of General Fund revenue ($7.3 million in FY26-27), rising an estimated 1% per year from growth alone — Council has not raised the rate since FY15-16. "Other Revenue" ($17.1 million) includes fees, franchise revenue, and $9 million in staff/administrative service charges billed to other funds.

    See detailed revenue trends in Budget Summaries · Revenues
    General Fund

    Five-Year Financial Forecast

    The forecast demonstrates that estimated ongoing operating revenues are sufficient to cover ongoing expenditures throughout the period. The planned reduction in fund balance reflects a deliberate drawdown to fund Capital Improvement Plan projects, as presented to City Council on January 27, 2026.

    FY26-27 Operating Revenue
    $354.6M
    Total operating revenue, all sources
    FY26-27 Expenditures
    $372.5M
    Incl. transfers out & debt service
    FY30-31 Ending Balance
    $120.2M
    Down from $265.4M in FY26-27
    Contingency Reserve
    $5.0M
    FY26-27, tapering to $0 by FY27-28

    General Fund Revenue vs. Expenditures & Ending Fund Balance

    FY26-27 Expenditure Composition — $338.9M Operating

    Special Revenue & Enterprise Funds

    Other Major Funds

    Five-year forecasts for the City's other major funds were also presented to Council on January 27, 2026, and used as a basis to set the FY26-27 budget for each fund — prepared using the same tools and methods as the General Fund forecast.

    Revenue vs. Expenditures & Ending Fund Balance

    In Closing

    Conclusion

    Long-range forecasting and modeling are powerful management and decision-making tools. The City Council's ability to make sound financial decisions and provide guidance on long-range planning are key factors in ensuring the City's fiscal health.

    The current Five-Year Financial Forecast highlights the need to exercise fiscal discretion and restraint, carefully examine any projects that entail ongoing expenses, practice prudent fiscal management, and remain conservative in our financial and strategic planning.

    City of Glendale, Arizona — FY 2026–27 Budget Summary · Financial Guidelines
    City of Glendale, Arizona  ·  Fiscal Year 2026–27

    Budget Summary

    The annual budget is divided into four major components that include all appropriations for the City. Together they make up the total adopted spending plan for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2026.

    $1.41BILLION
    ▼ 3.4% vs. FY25-26 prior year total: $1.46 billion
    Total Appropriations by ComponentHover or tap a segment for detail
    $1.41B total
    At a Glance

    Four components, one budget

    Each component funds a different part of City operations. Click any card to jump to where it's discussed in detail.

    Budget Composition

    How the budget breaks down

    Switch between views to see appropriations by major component, the operating budget by fund type, and Capital Improvement Plan funding by source.

    Financial Plan Summary

    Sources, uses & fund balances

    The City's total sources are estimated at $1.23 billion and total uses are projected at $1.63 billion, including inter-fund transfers. Fund balance drawdowns are planned for several capital-intensive funds, largely reflecting large project carryover in the Special Revenue (Transportation), Capital Projects (Streets and Transportation), and Enterprise (Water and Sewer, Landfill and Solid Waste) funds. Internal Service Funds also show planned reductions for one-time projects.

    Fund Type Est. Balance 7/1/2026 Total Sources Total Uses Est. Balance 6/30/2027

    In millions. *General Fund includes Vehicle Replacement Fund. **Internal Services/Other includes Permanent Funds. Click a column header to sort.

    Narrative

    Operating Budget

    The development of Glendale's FY26-27 budget was an open process designed to reflect the needs and desires of the community. Throughout the year, the Mayor, Council and City staff obtained input from the community through neighborhood meetings, citizen boards and commissions, and other contacts with individuals and groups. In addition, citizen feedback about the proposed FY26-27 budget was sought at a public hearing on June 9, 2026.

    In January 2026, staff presented the City's Five-Year Financial Forecast, which allows various budget scenarios to be tested for their effect on the City's financial condition on a long-range basis. At the same time, the City's CIP Management Team began the process of updating the Ten-Year Capital Improvement Plan. The Council reviewed the City Manager's proposed balanced budget at workshop sessions from March through April 2026, where issues surrounding the upcoming fiscal year's operating, capital, and debt service budgets were discussed.

    The draft budget, as revised by Council, became the tentative FY26-27 budget. It was published and made available for public review prior to the public hearing and formal adoption of the final budget on June 9, 2026.

    See department-by-department detail in the Operating section
    Narrative

    Capital Improvement Plan Budget

    The City updates the Ten-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) annually. The final decision to fund a project is made by the Council. Projects include renovations to City buildings, street and park improvements, police/fire department facilities, and upgrades to water treatment and wastewater collection facilities.

    $2.8B
    Ten-year plan, FY2027–2036
    $441M
    FY26-27 capital investment
    $234M
    Prior-year carryover included

    The first year of the plan is the only year appropriated by Council; the remaining nine years are for planning purposes only, and funding is not guaranteed to occur in the year planned. The CIP Management Team — staff from Engineering, Transportation, Field Operations, Water Services, and Budget and Finance — reviews all CIP projects for construction cost and projected operating impact. Projects with high operating costs are weighed against the Five-Year Forecast and may be deferred so the City can absorb the operating impact once a facility becomes operational.

    Explore the full Capital Improvement Plan
    Narrative

    Amending the Budget

    Once Council adopts the annual budget, total expenditures cannot exceed the final appropriation of $1.41 billion for FY26-27. With Council's formal approval, the City can adjust total appropriations across funds, provided the budget does not exceed the final appropriation for the fiscal year — meaning an increase to one fund's appropriation must be offset by an equal reduction elsewhere. Council may also amend the budget to a figure lower than the final appropriation.

    Amendments are necessary throughout the year to address new issues, increased prices, changes in project scope, and unforeseen issues affecting City operations, and follow the City's budget transfer policy. During the last three months of the fiscal year, Council may approve the transfer of unencumbered appropriation among funds and departments. The Budget and Finance Department processes all budget amendments in the financial management system following appropriate authorization by the Mayor and Council or the City Manager or designee.

    Reference

    Fund Descriptions

    The City uses fund accounting to track revenues and expenditures across seven main categories — general, special revenue, debt service, permanent, capital projects, enterprise, and internal service — comprising over 100 separate funds. Search or browse the most significant funds within each category below.

    See every fund and the departments that use it in the Appendix Fund Matrix
    Source: City of Glendale, Arizona — FY2026-27 Annual Budget, Budget Summary section. Interactive edition · Budget & Finance Department
    City of Glendale, Arizona  ·  Fiscal Year 2026–27

    Revenues

    Total revenues available to the City in FY26-27 from all sources are $1.006 billion. Just over a third flows into the General Fund, with Enterprise and Special Revenue funds making up most of the remainder.

    $1.006BILLION
    Total resources available to the City across all fund types in FY26-27.
    $364M
    General Fund (36%)
    $268M
    Enterprise Funds (27%)
    $232M
    Special Revenue Funds (23%)
    Total Revenue by Fund TypeHover or tap a segment for detail
    $1.006B total
    At a Glance

    Where revenue comes from

    Three fund groups account for 86% of all City revenue. Click any card to jump to its detail section.

    Revenue Composition

    How revenue breaks down

    Switch views to see total revenue by fund type, the General Fund's own revenue mix, and how Water & Sewer revenue is sourced.

    General Fund Group · Fund 1000

    General Fund

    For FY26-27, total General Fund revenue is expected to grow in line with the economic forecast from local and state experts. The City expects to collect $364 million in total General Fund revenue, with City Sales Tax and State-Shared Revenues continuing to comprise 65–75% of that total, as they have since FY01-02.

    The General Fund revenue projection is based on historical trend data; projected changes in state and local population, disposable personal income, retail sales, and inflation; economic forecasts of state, local, and national economic activity from experts on the Arizona economy; and statistical analyses.

    For FY26-27, City Sales Tax, State Sales Tax, State Income Tax, and Motor Vehicle In-Lieu Revenues are expected to comprise 83% — $299 million — of the $364 million General Fund revenue.

    Special Revenue Fund Group

    Special Revenue Funds

    Special Revenue Funds total $232 million (23% of all revenue) and are restricted to the specific purpose of each fund's activity. The three largest are detailed below, alongside Airport revenue.

    $48.9M
    Transportation Sales Tax Fund
    $44.2M
    Public Safety Sales Tax (Police + Fire)
    $68M
    Other Grants Fund (Federal & State)
    Enterprise Fund Group

    Enterprise Funds

    Enterprise Funds total $268 million (27% of all revenue) and are mainly generated through user fees for services the City provides directly to residents and businesses — water, sewer, landfill, and solid waste collection.

    Reference

    Revenue Source & Fund Detail

    Search or browse every revenue source discussed in this section. Each entry links to its full 10-year trend in the explorer above.

    Source: City of Glendale, Arizona — FY2026-27 Annual Budget, Budget Summary section. Interactive edition · Budget & Finance Department
    City of Glendale, Arizona  ·  Fiscal Year 2026–27

    Expenditures

    The FY26-27 operating budget totals $714.3 million, a 0.6% increase over FY25-26. Together with $441.2 million in capital spending, debt service, and contingency, total City appropriations reach $1.41 billion.

    $714.3MILLION
    ▲ 0.6% vs. FY25-26Total operating budget across all fund types in FY26-27.
    $355.0M
    General Fund Group (49.7%)
    $146.4M
    Enterprise Fund Group (20.5%)
    $125.9M
    Internal Service Fund Group (17.6%)
    Operating Budget by Fund GroupHover or tap a segment for detail
    $714.3M total operating
    At a Glance

    How the City spends

    Personnel-heavy public services dominate the operating budget. Click any card to jump to its detail section.

    Operating Budget

    Five-year operating budget history

    The operating budget has grown from $471.3 million in FY22-23 to $714.3 million in FY26-27, reflecting both service growth and inflationary cost pressure.

    Operating Budget, FY22-23 – FY26-27

    Comparison of Operating Budgets by Fund

    Year-over-year change for the City's largest operating funds, grouped by fund type.

    Fund NameFY 2026FY 2027% Change

    Budgeted operating expenditures include services and programs for the community, such as public safety, community services, economic development, general government and administration, parks and recreation, street maintenance, and water, sewer, landfill, and solid waste services. Most operating costs are accounted for in the General Fund group, though some are funded by Special Revenue Funds — such as the State's Highway User Revenue Fund for street and traffic maintenance and the dedicated Transportation Sales Tax fund. Enterprise Funds account for water, sewer, landfill, and solid waste services, while the Internal Service group covers employer-related benefits, equipment, and technology funds.

    The General Fund Group has the largest operating budget at $355 million in FY26-27, a 1.5% increase over FY25-26. The Special Revenue Fund group rose just $410 thousand (0.5%); appropriation here also accommodates grant opportunities the City may pursue or has already been awarded, though grant appropriation can't be spent unless the City applies for and receives the corresponding funds. The Enterprise Fund group decreased $4.8 million (3.2%), mainly attributable to higher supplies and materials costs. The Internal Service Fund group rose 3.1%, mainly from increases in the Benefits Trust Fund, Risk Management, Fleet Services, and Technology.

    Departments

    Operating Budget by Department

    Police Services is the largest department at $156.1 million (21.8% of the total operating budget), followed by Water Services, Field Operations, and Fire Services. Switch between All Funds and General Fund Only to see how each department's budget is funded.

    Department Reference

    All-Funds operating budget and share of total for every City department. Descriptions are included where the budget book discusses them individually.

    Staffing & Personnel

    Personnel costs & staffing levels

    Personnel costs are a significant share of the City's total operating budget: 50% — $357.0 million of the $714.3 million FY26-27 operating budget — is attributable to wages, salaries, and benefits. Approximately 73% of the General Fund's $355 million operating budget goes to salaries and related benefits.

    FundWages & SalariesRetirementHealthcareOther BenefitsTotal Comp.

    FTEs per 1,000 Population, 2018–2027

    8.09 in FY26-27

    For FY26-27, a total of 29.75 Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) positions were added city-wide.

    Staffing Levels by Fund (Full-Time Equivalents)

    Five-year comparison across every fund with authorized positions.

    Includes only funds with current or historical position counts.

    Fund Summary

    Sources, uses & fund balances

    Beginning balances for all funds are estimated at $969.3 million, and ending fund balances at $565.6 million. Planned fund balance drawdowns continue to fund significant capital projects and one-time expenditures.

    In dollars. "Expenditures" reflects total uses (operating, capital, debt service & contingency) per fund type — consistent with the $1.41 billion total appropriations covered in the Budget Summary Overview section.

    Fund Detail

    Fund Expenditure Detail

    Search or browse how each major fund's budget breaks down between operating, capital, debt service, and contingency.

    Capital Improvement Plan

    Capital Improvement Plan Expenditures

    The total capital budget for FY26-27 is $441.2 million — the first year of funding of the ten-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Most of the CIP is pay-as-you-go, funded with fund balance or current revenues.

    $441.2M
    Total FY26-27 capital budget
    $234M
    Carryover from prior-year projects (53%)
    $207M
    New FY26-27 project funding (47%)
    $107.5M
    Transportation & Streets — 24% of CIP

    Water and Sewer projects total $98 million and account for 22% of the CIP budget; Transportation and Street projects total $107.5 million, representing 24% of the Capital Improvement budget. The carryover funding of $234 million represents projects budgeted in prior years but not yet completed. This budget is described in further detail in the Capital Improvement Plan section of this document.

    Significant FY26-27 projects include:

    • Drainage improvements on Bethany Home Road between 43rd Avenue and 51st Avenue
    • Thunderbird Conservation Park improvements
    • $21+ million for citywide pavement management
    • Water treatment plant improvements
    • New police crime laboratory
    Explore projects, funding sources, and the 10-year plan in the CIP section
    Source: City of Glendale, Arizona — FY2026-27 Annual Budget, Budget Summary section. Interactive edition · Budget & Finance Department
    City of Glendale, Arizona  ·  Fiscal Year 2026–27

    Debt Service

    Budgeted Debt Service for FY26-27 totals $112.5 million. The City's disciplined, systematic approach to debt management — guided by a formal Debt Management Plan — has produced stable credit ratings across every debt category.

    $112.5MILLION
    Total FY26-27 Debt Service across all bond types and obligations.
    $35.1M
    Water & Sewer Bonds (31.2%)
    $31.1M
    Excise Tax Debt (27.7%)
    $21.1M
    General Obligation Bonds (18.7%)
    FY26-27 Debt Service by TypeHover or tap a segment for detail
    $112.5M total
    At a Glance

    How the City's debt is structured

    Seven debt types, each backed by a different revenue source and subject to its own legal limitations and bond covenants.

    Composition

    FY26-27 Debt Service by Type

    Excise Tax debt is serviced through all Excise, Transaction Privilege, Franchise, and Income Taxes the City collects. Water and Sewer Bond debt is paid through utility revenues. G.O. debt is serviced through Secondary Property Tax levies.

    5-Year Payment Schedule

    Table 1 — 5-Year Debt Payment Schedule

    Principal and interest payments for every outstanding City bond issue, FY26-27 through FY30-31, as of June 30, 2026.

    Bond DescriptionFY26-27FY27-28FY28-29FY29-30FY30-31Final Pmt.

    * Refunding. Figures do not include fees. *** Anticipated new debt being issued.

    Amortization Schedules

    Long-Range Annual Debt Service

    Principal and interest by year through final maturity for each major debt category. Considerable portions of debt are paid off in the earlier years of the forecast, freeing up capacity for future bond issues.

    G.O. Bonds

    Bond Capacity & Voter Authorization

    Under Arizona law, cities can obtain long-term financing through G.O. bonds only with voter approval. Remaining authorization reflects unused capacity from the 1981, 1987, 1999, 2007, 2023, and 2025 bond elections — bond proceeds must be used for the purpose specified in the authorizing election.

    Table 2 — Constitutional Debt Limitation

    As of July 1, 2026 (all dollars in thousands)
    6% Limitation — General Municipal Purpose$145,902
    Less direct bonded debt outstanding$14,580
    Unused 6% Borrowing Capacity$131,322
    20% Limitation — Water, Sewer, Flood Control, Streets, etc.$486,339
    Less direct bonded debt outstanding$165,045
    Unused 20% Borrowing Capacity$321,294

    Based on 2026 limited assessed value of $2,431,694,599. Public safety, streets, parking, and transportation facilities debt prior to Prop. 104 is included in the 20% category.

    G.O. Project Categories

    Arizona's State Constitution limits G.O. bonded indebtedness to 6% or 20% of a city's total limited property value.

    20% Category: Water, sewer, storm sewers (flood control facilities), and artificial light when controlled by the municipality; open space preserves, parks, playgrounds, and recreational facilities; public safety, law enforcement, fire and emergency services facilities; and streets and transportation facilities.

    6% Category: Economic development; historic preservation and cultural facilities; general government facilities; and libraries.

    Table 3 — Projected G.O. Debt Capacity

    All dollars in thousands. Outstanding debt refers to the principal balance only.

    Historic & Projected Secondary Assessed Valuation

    FY28–32 projected at 3%/yr.

    Secondary Property Tax Rate

    For the FY26-27 budget, the total Property Tax Rate decreased to $1.3883 from the prior year rate of $1.4538. The Primary Property Tax rate is $0.3096 per $100 of assessed valuation, and the Secondary Property Tax rate is $1.0787 per $100 of assessed valuation. Council voted not to increase the Secondary Property Tax rate in FY26-27.

    $1.0787
    Secondary rate per $100 AV
    $26.2M
    Total secondary levy (up from $25.4M)

    Secondary Property Tax revenue is restricted solely to paying General Obligation Debt Service. Three components must be measured before additional G.O. bonds can be issued: sufficient voter authorization for the project category, compliance with the 6%/20% constitutional debt limitation, and City policy requiring the G.O. Debt Service fund balance to be at least 10% of the next fiscal year's property-tax-supported Debt Service.

    Credit Ratings

    Stable Ratings Across Every Debt Category

    Glendale's disciplined, systematic approach to debt management has produced stable credit ratings from Fitch, Moody's, and Standard & Poor's.

    Coverage & Policy Compliance

    Debt Coverage Ratios

    Bond covenants and City financial policies require minimum coverage ratios for each revenue-backed debt category. Switch between views to see how FY26-27 through FY30-31 are projected to perform against each requirement.

    Excise Tax & Municipal Property Corporation Bonds

    The City currently has two MPC issuances, senior lien obligations. Council's financial policy states Excise Tax debt service will not exceed 10% of the 5-year average of General Fund operating revenue. Bond covenants additionally require unrestricted Excise Tax revenue of at least three times the maximum annual Debt Service on senior lien debt, and two times on combined senior and subordinate liens. Unrestricted Excise Tax means all Excise, Transaction Privilege, Franchise, and Income Taxes the City collects or may collect, excluding taxes restricted to specific uses such as the Public Safety Tax and Transportation Sales Tax. For FY26-27, the General Fund transfer to the Excise Tax Debt Service fund is budgeted at $31.1 million.

    Water & Sewer and Transportation Revenue Bonds

    Water/sewer revenue bond sales are limited by Ordinance 1323 New Series (1984) and Ordinance 1784 New Series (1993); the bond covenant requires net utility revenue of at least 1.20 times maximum annual Debt Service. There is an additional $10 million remaining in water/sewer voter authorization for new water/sewer revenue or G.O. bonds. Transportation Sales Tax revenue supports Debt Service for a FY07-08 revenue bond obligation with a minimum 2.0x coverage ratio established at issuance — voter authorization is not required for Transportation Sales Tax Revenue Obligations. For more information, see the Glendale OnBoard Annual Report.

    Inter-Fund Transfers

    Maintenance of Effort Transfers

    Appropriated inter-fund transfers are a necessary mechanism for one fund to support the operations of another. As requested by Council, the FY26-27 budget includes maintenance of effort transfers of $2.3 million from the General Fund to the Enterprise Funds. Total inter-fund transfers for FY26-27 are $223.7 million (see Schedule 4).

    Source: City of Glendale, Arizona — FY2026-27 Annual Budget, Budget Summary section. Interactive edition · Budget & Finance Department
    FY 2026–27 Budget · Section Six

    Operating

    A department-by-department look at how the City delivers services — mission, strategic priorities, budget, and staffing for all 24 operating departments.

    24 Departments
    General Government to Public Safety
    $714.3M
    Total FY26-27 Operating Budget
    2,109.25
    Citywide Authorized FTEs
    City of Glendale, Arizona — FY 2026–27 Budget Summary · Operating
    City of Glendale, Arizona  ·  Fiscal Year 2026–27

    Capital Improvement Plan

    The CIP is a ten-year roadmap for creating, maintaining, and paying for Glendale's present and future capital needs — outlining the cost, funding source, and timing of every major project the City plans to build, replace, or improve.

    Total programmed across the FY2027–2036 ten-year plan, including carryover from projects already underway.
    10-Year CIP by Project TypeHover or tap a segment for detail
    What Are Capital Improvements?

    Building and maintaining the city you live in

    Capital improvements are the non-routine investments — generally costing more than $50,000 with a useful life of at least five years — that keep Glendale's infrastructure functioning and prepare the city for future growth. A wide range of projects make up the plan:

    Capital projects can mean the purchase of equipment, the acquisition of land, the design and construction of new assets, or the renovation, rehabilitation, or expansion of existing ones. This infrastructure is what every city must have in place to provide essential and quality-of-life services to current and future residents, businesses, and visitors.

    Glendale, like many cities in the Phoenix metropolitan area, faces a special challenge: much of the city is built out, except for scattered infill areas at its far western edge. The City must build new roads and extend water, sewer, and public-safety services to support new development — while simultaneously maintaining, replacing, and upgrading the roads, parks, buildings, and underground pipes it already owns.

    What qualifies as a capital project?

    • Costs more than $50,000
    • Has an expected useful life of at least five years
    • Addresses all federal, state, and city legal and financial requirements
    • Supports the city's favorable investment ratings and financial integrity
    • Is generally part of an adopted master plan for that infrastructure
    Summary by Project Type

    Where the ten-year investment goes

    The plan spans 14 project types. Water, Streets, Public Safety, and Wastewater together account for the large majority of programmed dollars. Hover the donut or sort the table to explore.

    Carryover reflects funding for projects already appropriated in prior years that continues into the FY2027–2036 plan. FY 2032–36 is a combined five-year bucket. Figures are in whole dollars.

    Summary by Funding Source

    How the plan is paid for

    Every CIP project is matched to one or more funding sources. Many large or multi-year projects use a mix. Grouped into six broad categories, the plan's 38 individual funding sources break down as follows.

    G.O. & Excise Tax Bonds are repaid from secondary property taxes; Enterprise revenue comes from water, sewer, landfill, and solid-waste user fees; DIFs are one-time charges on new development; grants require a local match. Ongoing maintenance and operating costs are generally paid from the General Fund.

    Project Explorer

    Drill down to any project

    Choose a project type to see its funding mix and full project list, or search all 325 projects by name or number. Select any project to view its description, justification, year-by-year cost by phase, and funding sources.

    Operating & Maintenance Impact

    What it costs to run, after it's built

    Almost every new capital asset adds ongoing operating expense — staff, utilities, and upkeep — once it opens. These amounts are separate from the construction costs above and are generally paid from the General Fund. The projects below carry identified operating impacts across the ten-year window.

    Operating & maintenance figures are projected annual costs (shown for each year 2027–2036) and are tracked independently of the capital phases shown in the Project Explorer.

    Paying for the Plan

    Planning like a household — at city scale

    In many respects, selecting, scheduling, and financing capital improvements parallels how a family plans to buy a house or car: weighing competing needs, setting priorities, evaluating operating costs and financing options, and setting realistic timelines.

    Most large capital improvements cannot be financed from a single year's revenue. Although only the first year of the plan is appropriated, the first five years are financially balanced — they comply with the state's constitutional debt limits, can be funded with available voter authorization for General Obligation bonds, and balance incoming revenue against fund balance while staying within bond covenants.

    Financial and legal constraints make it impossible to fund every project on the priority list at once. The City cannot run several large projects with significant operating impacts concurrently, and the revenue available to pay debt service is not unlimited. Implementation timetables therefore stagger projects over time, based on Council's strategic goals and forecasted resources.

    The questions every plan must answer

    • Can the project wait another year or two?
    • Are there alternatives, such as remodeling instead of building new?
    • What can the City afford, and how will it pay?
    • Is outside financing needed, and what will it cost?
    • What ongoing costs will the purchase add?

    Council's order of priority for capital needs

    A

    Improve existing assets

    Extend the life and performance of infrastructure the City already owns.

    B

    Replace existing assets

    Renew assets that have reached the end of their useful life.

    C

    Construct new assets

    Add new capacity to serve growth and new service needs.

    See how debt is structured and repaid in Budget Summaries · Debt Service
    Prioritization & Citizen Input

    How projects earn a place in the plan

    For projects expected to be funded with General Obligation bonds, the City and Council use a project matrix — first adopted during the FY19–28 budget — to score proposals against the criteria Council determined matter most.

    Citizen involvement in the CIP

    The CIP is an important financial, planning, and public-communication tool — giving residents and businesses a concrete view of the city's long-term direction. Input is gathered from citizens who serve on boards and commissions such as the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee, the Library Advisory Board, the Arts Commission, and the Citizens Utilities Advisory Commission, as well as from individuals through public hearings, Council meetings, and district meetings.

    Master plans — the Water and Sewer, Parks, Storm Water, and GO Transportation plans, among others — together with annual economic forecasts help determine which projects belong in the plan and when. The City Council reviews the recommended CIP during the spring budget workshops and considers staff recommendations and citizen requests before making final decisions.

    Impact on the operating budget

    Almost every new capital improvement requires additional ongoing expense for routine operation, repair, and maintenance — and some require additional staff (a new fire station needs new firefighters). PAYGO projects, grant-matching funds, and lease/purchase costs also come directly from the operating budget.

    At the same time, many capital projects contribute positively to the city's fiscal health — redevelopment and infrastructure that supports new development can generate additional operating revenue to maintain and expand the city's infrastructure.

    Source: City of Glendale, Arizona — FY2026-27 Annual Budget, Capital Improvement Plan (Munis CIP download, FY2027–2036). Interactive edition · Budget & Finance Department
    FY 2026–27 Budget · Section Four

    Schedules

    The budget schedules summarize the City's financial activities in a comprehensive, numeric format — giving the reader a glance at the City's financial situation across every fund and department.

    8
    City Schedules (1–8)
    7
    State Budget Forms (A–G)
    $1.41B
    Total All Funds, FY26-27
    All Funds
    Every fund, every department
    Reader's Guide

    Why Have Schedules?

    The budget schedules summarize the City's financial activities in a comprehensive, numeric format, intended to give the reader a glance at the City's financial situation.

    Schedule 1 is the most comprehensive schedule, offering a summary of all pertinent financial information for all the City's funds — starting and ending fund balances, transfers in and out, revenues, and operating, capital, and debt service expenditures for each fund. The remaining schedules provide in-depth detail of budgetary information necessary for the smooth operation of the city, serving as handy reference materials to City employees and to the public.

    City Schedules

    1

    Fund Balance Summary

    Inflows, outflows, and the effect on fund balance for every fund.

    2

    Revenues by Fund

    A multi-year look at revenues by individual fund.

    3

    Operating Expenditures

    A multi-year look at operating expenditures by department.

    4

    Inter-Fund Transfers

    A summary of scheduled transfers between funds.

    5

    Property Tax Rates & Levies

    A multi-year look at Glendale property tax rates and levies.

    6

    Authorized Staffing

    A multi-year listing of departmental authorized staffing by position.

    7

    Debt Service Obligations

    The current year's debt service obligations by bond issue.

    8

    Internal Service Premiums

    Internal service premiums by fund and department.

    Official Budget Forms — Arizona Office of the Auditor General

    A

    Summary of Estimated Revenues & Expenditures

    The state-mandated summary schedule across all fund types.

    B

    Tax Levy & Tax Rate Information

    Primary and secondary property tax levy detail.

    C

    Revenues Other Than Property Taxes

    Every non-property-tax revenue source, by fund and category.

    D

    Other Financing Sources/(Uses) & Transfers

    Financing sources and inter-fund transfers by fund.

    E

    Expenditures/Expenses by Fund

    Budgeted and actual expenditures organized by fund.

    F

    Expenditures/Expenses by Department

    Budgeted and actual expenditures organized by department.

    G

    Full-Time Employees & Personnel Compensation

    FTE counts and total compensation cost by fund.

    Unfamiliar term? Look it up in the Glossary

    Schedule 1 — Fund Balance Summary

    Summary of the inflows and outflows and the effect on fund balance for every City fund.

    Reference

    Using These Schedules

    City vs. State Schedules

    Schedules 1 through 8 are Glendale's own internal reference schedules, built for department and public use. Schedules A through G are the official budget forms required by the Arizona Office of the Auditor General, formatted to that office's statewide reporting standard.

    Searching a Schedule

    Every schedule above supports live search — start typing any fund name, department, position title, or revenue source to filter the table instantly. Indented rows represent sub-categories or line items beneath the bolded header directly above them.

    City of Glendale, Arizona — FY 2026–27 Budget Summary · Schedules
    FY 2026–27 Budget · Section Five

    Appendix

    Supporting reference material for the FY 2026–27 Annual Budget — the Council's signed adopting resolution, a matrix of every City fund, and plain-language guides to the terms, acronyms, and questions readers ask most.

    R26-64
    Final Budget Resolution
    52 Funds
    Active across 7 fund groups
    58 Terms
    Glossary of Budget Terms
    25 FAQs
    Frequently Asked Questions
    Reader's Guide

    About the Appendix

    The Appendix closes out the Annual Budget Book with the legal record of adoption and the reference material that supports every other section of the document.

    Legal Record of Adoption

    Final Budget Resolution — No. R26-64

    A resolution of the Council of the City of Glendale, Maricopa County, Arizona, adopting the final budget of the amounts required for the public expense for the City of Glendale for the fiscal year 2026–2027, setting forth the revenue and the amount to be raised by direct property taxation, and adopting the City Council's Financial Policies.

    Tentative Budget Approved
    May 12, 2026
    Resolution No. R26-52
    Final Budget Adopted
    June 9, 2026
    Resolution No. R26-64
    Property Tax Levy Set
    June 23, 2026
    Per Section 2 of the resolution
    Fiscal Year Covered
    FY 2026–27
    July 1, 2026 – June 30, 2027

    Section 1 of the resolution adopts the schedules contained in Exhibit A as the final budget for the fiscal year. Section 3 authorizes expenditures from the appropriation for contingencies upon recommendation by the City Manager and approval of the City Council. Sections 4 and 5 confirm that appropriated funds may be used for any lawful purpose except where restricted by federal or state law or the Glendale City Charter, and that all sums in the final budget are considered specific appropriation and authority for expenditure.

    Resolution No. R26-64, page 1
    Page 1 of 2 — Resolution Text
    Resolution No. R26-64, page 2 with signatures
    Page 2 of 2 — Passed, Adopted & Approved, June 9, 2026
    Reference

    Fund Matrix

    The City maintains 52 funds with department-level activity in FY26-27, across seven fund groups. Browse by fund to see which departments use it, or by department to see which funds it draws on.

    Reference

    Glossary of Terms

    Plain-language definitions for budgeting terms and terms specific to Glendale's financial planning process.

    Reference

    Acronyms

    Common abbreviations used throughout the Annual Budget document.

    Help

    Frequently Asked Questions

    This user guide provides assistance to those unfamiliar with Glendale's budgeting and financial planning processes.

    i

    Still have a question?

    City of Glendale, Budget and Finance Department — 5850 W Glendale Ave, Glendale, Arizona 85301 — (623) 930-2480 — glendaleaz.gov